![]() Reinforcement for the treatment of a child’s multiply controlled Comparison of differential reinforcement and noncontingent Kodak T, Miltenberger R G, Romanuik C.Choice as an intervention to improve behavior: A review of the Kern L, Vorndran C M, Hilt A, Ringdahl J E, Adelman B E, Dunlap G.Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve theĬlassroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioralĬhallenges. Kern L, Childs K E, Dunlap G, Clarke S, Falk G D.Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escapeīehavior. Iwata B A, Pace G M, Kalsher M J, Cowdery G E, Cataldo M F. ![]() The functions of self-injurious behavior: AnĮxperimental-epidemiological analysis. Iwata B A, Pace G M, Dorsey M F, Zarcone J R, Vollmer T R, Smith R G, et al.What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form andįunction. Iwata B A, Pace G M, Cowdery G E, Miltenberger R G.Clinical application of functional analysis Reinforcement: The role of reinforcement contingency andĭensity. Treatment of escape-maintained behavior with positive Ingvarsson E T, Hanley G P, Welter K M.A review of behavioral conceptualizations and treatments of child ![]() Houlihan D D, Sloane H N, Jones R N, Patten C. ![]() The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalentĬompeting behaviors. On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment andĮxtinction components of function-based interventions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |